Wednesday, November 5, 2008

A New Morning in America

I have to admit that I was nervous last night. I voted early and then spent the day canvassing in the nearest battleground state. I saw the energy and excitement, the lines at the polls, and the army of volunteers. In my head, I knew that Obama would be our next president and that a victory would likely be by a significant margin. I was doing what I could to to help. But still, as the early returns came in, I was nervous that something was going to snatch this away.

This morning, the energy and excitement are still there and nothing can change the outcome now.

So how did it happen? Why was Obama successful where Kerry and Gore were not?

There will endless disection of McCain and Palin's missteps and opportunities lost as well as Obama and Biden's successful moves. In the end, however, I think that there are four major causes:
- First, divisive politics has played itself out. It seemed that even those who played that game were sick of it. It's exhausting. Any government that emphasizes ideology too much over practicality unltimately falls in on itself (no matter what the ideology). People have real problems and, here among the general populace, it is pretty obvious that the challenges we face are enormous and that it is going to take all of us pulling together to solve them. Obama has tapped into that desire to be one country again.
- Second, the kid came to play. Obama's team ran a campaign designed to win. From the fund raising to the efforts on the ground, these folks understood that they had to organize, mobilize, and execute. Although the big bucks get the attention, the innovation, discipline, and execution were an equal part of the victory. Howard Dean may be the unsung hero here as he was the one pushing for a 50-state strategy early on; coupled with Obama's message and delivery, it was a strategy that just out-matched McCain.
- Third, the next generation is ready to take on the responsibility of leadership. With McCain's defeat and Obama's victory, we are seeing a true generational transition. The contest in four years will feature Obama and a Republican from his age cohort. Stepping up to shouldering our challenges comes just in time because there is plenty of work to do. This is when we of the post-WWII/post-Vietnam cohort step out of the shadows and look the future square in the eye.
- Fourth is luck. Had the economy melted in December instead of October, the outcome of the election might have been different. Show me a successful candidate who thinks luck wasn't a factor in his or her victory and I'll show you one who is lying.

We should be proud that we have elected our first African-American president. It is a divide that needed to be crossed. We have not worked out all of the issues of race relations but we have raised them to a new (and hopefully more productive) plateau.

We should also be proud of the roles that Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin played in this race. Though neither of them will be in the White House this time, no one will be surprised when a woman is on a national ticket again nor will we be shocked if she wins. In fact, we'll be surprised if a woman isn't on the ticket. That glass ceiling has been shattered.

Senator McCain was particularly gracious and generous in his concession speech. If we had seen more of that John McCain in the campaign, he might have been delivering an acceptance speech instead. It was not to be for Senator McCain but we should all be proud of his long and continued service.

I was drawn to Senator Obama early in the primaries. Despite the lack of a long resume, he inspired me in ways that the other candidates did not. I felt that was important -- as important as the ideas and the specifics (or lack thereof) in the policy proposals. But the job we have before us will not be solved by one man no matter how charismatic he may be. He is going to need us to be as passionate, as involved, and as ready to work as we have been over the past two years. We didn't just elect him; we elected us.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good points all. yes, the stars did align for Senator Obama at the end of the day, but it seems in hindsight a fitting victory, as if it was the right outcome for the right time. Let's hope we all - left and right - can capitalize on the times to end some of the divisions.

There is much the left can do to that end as well as those on the right, let's hope "victory disease" does not prevent them from seeing that.

Right about now, the euphoria is fading a bit, and I can almost picture a scene from the excellent John Adams miniseries with George Bush - who is no George Washington - turning to Barrack Obama - who is no John Adams - and saying "Now you are rightly in, and I am rightly out. We shall see who is the happiest".

I wish Barrack well. The weight of the Presidency in troubling times is about to land on his shoulders. I think he will stand up well to it, I have more hope than most of my conservative cohorts.

You know I will be on him like a hawk, but I think he will do things for the country that McCain could not have done just by who he is. Racial relations have been a part of this country since our birth(Thomas Jefferson - my favorite founding father - actually wanted to include freeing slaves in the Declaration of Independence), dimensions of those issues are part of our fabric today. Obama's election - if nothing else - does more for those relations than every President of our lifetime combined. That's something right there.

Eric McNulty said...

Response to Nick:
I think that a good first step is to stop categorizing everything as "left" or "right." I think that we're a bell-shaped country with 15% hardcore on each end and the other 70% somewhere in the middle.

Let's look at ideas with its ideological roots redacted and ask ourselves, "Will it help solve the problem?"

Anonymous said...

True, I wouldn't argue with those numbers. Onus is on you guys to do that though, if the Obama-Pelosi-Reid trimverate come out with the Fairness Doctrine, tax hikes, Hillarycare, and Al Gore as the Secretary of the Interior, then the schism will remain in place.

If, however, President Obama uses his mandate* to create a bipartisan environment in Washington where the parties work in cordial opposition once again, that is how the country will look. I join you in hoping for option B.

I put that "*" next to mandate not to undercut whether or not he has one - in 2004 we played the same game; everyone on the right claimed we had a mandate, everyone on the left claimed we did not. I - in this instance - think that Obama has a mandate because he is the most anticipated new President in a long time, his party and much of the political center are duly enthralled by watching his star rise, and his party holds the majority. Hence, where ever his vote total lands on the magical mandate-scale in Michael Barone's office, I would say Obama has one regardless. He will drive his agenda, congress will support it at least until the mid-terms with little to no opposition(Republicans to a certain extent as well).

So, it is like I said on my blog the other day - the ball is totally in Obama's court, where we go from here is up to him more than any other person on the planet. Let us all hope he can live up to that, I hope he will. That New Dealish press conference scared me a bit, but I think he's still realigning for his new post. Let's all hope Barrack choses to set a bipartisan tone and return some respect to the the romper room that Washington has become over the past 6 years